Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958
Sections 14(1)(e) & 25B(8)—Order of eviction—Bona fide need—Dismissal of application seeking leave to defend—Revision—Landlord cannot be forced to explore the possibility of carrying on his business from premises which may be owned by some other family member—Case of bona fide need can be assailed only if it is established that claim of landlord is based on a mere desire as opposed to a genuine and pressing requirement—No patent or manifest error was committed by the Rent Controller in rejecting the leave to defend as was sought—Applications dismissed.
[Paras 10 & 11]
Section 25B(8)—Revision—Jurisdiction—Powers of Courts are merely supervisory and one of superintendence.
[Para 12]
Decision : Applications dismissed