Specific Performance
Agreement to sell—Though the plaintiff has asserted that he is already been ready and willing but had failed to disclose anything about the resources which he had or from where he could make the payment of the balance sale consideration—Mere empty words of the plaintiff are not sufficient to establish that he had funds to make the payment of the balance amount nor his conduct reflected that he was willing to perform his part of the agreement—Plaintiff has not been able to prove his readiness or willingness to perform his part of the agreement—Plaintiffs have not disclosed the facts in right perspective and have already enjoyed the benefit of the ATS under the second ATS—Relief of specific performance is an equitable relief and circumstances of the present case do not justify plaintiffs to any relief—Plaintiffs are not entitled to any relief.
[Paras 85 & 91]