Delhi Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizen Rules, 2009
Rule 22(3)(4)—Order directing petitioner-son to vacate the suit property—Challenged—Petitioner is merely seeking to continue to be in illegal possession of property, despite knowing fully well that the person in possession does not and cannot become the owner—Father of petitioner, being the holder of the title documents of the property in question, there is nothing wrong in the impugned order—Petitioner is merely trying to re-agitate the issues which under fact and law are already settled—No merit found in the petition—Dismissed.
[Paras 6 to 8]